Archive for the ‘Libraries’ Category
Office 2013 Intersects with the Cloud and Tablet Computing
Posted in Education, Librarianship, Libraries, technology, Uncategorized, tagged cloud, computing, microsoft, mobile, office, office 2013, skydrive, tablet on August 9, 2012| Leave a Comment »
Great Volunteers Help Make a Great Library
Posted in Education, Librarianship, Libraries, Library School, tagged education, librarians, librarianship, libraries, library school on October 4, 2011| Leave a Comment »
I’m a little late posting for last week, so…
Last Week At the Library
Last week at the library I really started to make some headway on our project to reorganize our movie browser packs by genre. Together Jessica and I got through about fifty records. I’m starting to get into the flow of the steps we need to take in re-tooling our movie records. Unfortunately I realized last night that we have lost our major source for obtaining record information. I have been using Firstsearch, which usually provides some pretty decent information on items to help catalogers create good records for items. Well, I knew Firstsearch was on its way out, it is a service that has been dropped from OCLC. So I got the nasty but not unexpected surprise last night of having no access to Firstsearch. This will significantly slow ALL cataloging down, at least for a while. I try to really make a good record for each item I catalog, with multiple subject access points, and a summary. Now instead of going to one source for most of my information I’m stuck in the position of going to multiple sources (Melcat for subject headings, publication information) Amazon for some of the summaries, I imagine I’ll also be using the Library of Congress website.
Last week we also received TWO MONTHS worth of young adult and AV materials. I came in Friday to a disaster on my work table and had to spend thirty or forty-five minutes just organizing items that needed cataloging before I could get down to work. Who can work like that? Not me. Our donated materials will be receiving a lower priority as we move along with the movie project, so for now I moved the donations to the
basement and organized all the movies we received in a box. Stacking them up on my work table just doesn’t work. As the work piles up, I’m more grateful than ever for our new volunteer, Emily. You can read about Emily on Vicksburg District Library’s new downloadable PDF newsletter. Last week Emily cleared an entire cart of items to be placed in our book sale. Once the records for withdrawn items are taken out of the computer, the item is stamped with a discard stamp and the barcode is taken off. Emily spent a couple of hours Monday doing just that. When discarding staff have to be particularly careful about removing memorial plates and Emily did an excellent job catching them. She also started changing the browser packs over to our new genre scheme, for the records Jessica and I managed to get through. All the yellowing, cracking old browser packs are gone and in their place are new packs with the genre stickers and genre headings written out. They are looking fantastic.
Jessica and I will be meeting with one of Kalamazoo Public Library’s catalogers to discuss issues of cataloging, and in particular, movie records before we get too far into the project. We will be discussing what KPL considers important when cataloging, what fields are particularly important and which ones could perhaps be left out for the sake of speeding the project. We will be asking all the questions we have about cataloging in general. Last week Jessica and I took a look at pulling information from Firstsearch into the cataloging records and how I go about building my records. Of course, all this will have to go through some changes since we have now lost our predominant source of record information.
Last Week In Library School
Over the week and week-end I studied for and took my first test for my technology class. I was really stressing out about it because it’s my first test as a graduate student and I just didn’t know what it would be like. However, it was not very difficult for me and I believe I did well. I was face palming myself the next day though because I’m pretty sure one of the questions was supposed to be obvious to me at the time and it just wasn’t. The next day it was somewhat more obvious. However, it was only worth one point so I am not too concerned. Now that I know what the tests are like I can adjust my note taking process accordingly. I am really really enjoying the technology class. It’s filling in some gaps that I had in my knowledge and I feel like I just can’t get enough of it.
Last week we finished up our group blogs for our Introduction to the Profession class. I love how our blog turned out. We had a very talented member who created a custom header for us, and I think it just looks great and professional. It’s already been graded and I received full points on the assignment. It’s been a really fun experience reading everyone’s blogs and thinking about the issues that are affecting Librarianship. The blogs on censorship, multiculturalism and increasing relevancy in tough economic times all were great food for thought. In particular, one of my classmates brought up the topic of assigning rates to movies that come in “not rated” and stated this could be a form of censorship. I do this regularly to help provide some guidance on the content of movies that are not rated. If they are not rated so they can add extra content beyond the R rating, they get an R rating. If they are not rated for some other reason I have to look at it carefully and make a judgement call. I have never considered that this could be a form of censorship, but in fact I am making a rating assignment based slightly on my own values. But I am also really considering what the MPAA generally uses as criteria for ratings. So is the MPAA rating system a form of censorship? Lots of interesting topics this week, all important to Librarianship.
The Movie Project Begins
Posted in Education, Librarianship, Libraries, Library School, technology, tagged education, librarians, librarianship, libraries, library school, technology, trends on September 25, 2011| Leave a Comment »
This week at the library I started to review our movie records in cataloging to change them over to the new genre schema. I was simply delighted to find that the records I anticipated making a few changes to needed major re-tooling. This will slow the project significantly. In fact, I’ve only been able to finish about twenty-five records so far since I have many other duties as well. Many of our early movie records include no summary, just one or two subject access points, and are simply not up to my standard of cataloging. My colleague Jessica, the current children’s librarian, and I began a discussion of how we will approach this project. Jessica is not a cataloger, but has taken the “basic” course at library school.
So yesterday I sat down and created a cheat sheet with all the MARC fields I could think of that are used in cataloging movies. I then created a sample record including all these fields. Not very realistic, since I don’t think I’ve ever created records that use all the tags at the same time, but informative. I also printed some FirstSearch records and annotated them to point where the information in a FirstSearch record actually goes in the cataloging record. We plan to discuss the cataloging more on Wednesday when our work schedules overlap.
I was very excited to start getting to know our new volunteer and sub for the library this week. She worked with me Tuesday evening and I showed her how to perform many of the tasks our other circulation clerks work on. Some of the many tasks I demonstrated to Emily included packing MelCat books for outgoing delivery, balancing the cash drawer at the end of the evening and closing procedures. I also explained the reasoning behind why we do things the way we do them as much as possible. I felt this was not explained to me very well when I started working in libraries.
Perhaps to avoid overwhelming me, I received training that went like this “we do it this way, period.” I really enjoyed explaining how certain things work in the library world. I think it’s important support staff understand the underlying philosophy and challenges faced by the profession. In this way, they become more engaged, more excited, more aware (I hope). When I started working in libraries I had only a basic understanding of the underlying philosophy and challenges faced by the profession. I think my standards could have been so much higher with the right information. We also went over the process of re-processing browser packs in great detail. There are many steps involved with the process, but the basic procedure is two steps:
1. Re-processing the browser packs from the list provided by the cataloger, and annotating those browser packs not found.
2. Determining the status of the browser packs not found and returning the list back to the cataloger for further action.
There are many sub-steps involved and I anticipate the project getting off the ground slowly, just as it is for the cataloging back-end. I have to become conditioned to scan records and identify missing fields quicker. I hope this will happen naturally as we go along. I also finished cataloging all the new video games for the library and they were processed by our clerks. They will be going out this week and I’m super excited about it!
In related news, I have started reading the book Library 2.0 and Beyond. It is slightly outdated, but I think there will still be some good information to learn. I am also really excited about a FREE virtual conference, Library 2.011 Worldwide Virtual Conference, which is November 2-3. I learned about the conference from following Michael Stephens on Twitter. If you don’t know who Michael Stephens is, go find out! He’s awesome. He writes a blog title “Tame the Web,” is an LIS professor and whose research focuses on emerging technologies in the library profession.
This week in Library School I finished my portion of the blog for our Introduction to the Profession class. The blog focuses on the impact of E-Reader technology on the library profession. I’m gearing up for my library visit, which is a big project involving a visit to two libraries and a detailed comparison paper. I will be visiting the Portage District Library and the Kalamazoo Public Library. I hope to schedule visits soon! Some of my readings this week focused on copyright issues. While it’s not a subject area I love, it’s certainly an important topic in Librarianship.
I was surprised to find out how poorly the law actually defines free use. In fact, you aren’t even necessarily safe if you are carefully citing sources in a scholarly paper. There are a number of factors the courts use to determine whether a work falls within the safe haven of fair use, but even if you document everything properly and follow copyright “fair use checklists” you might still end up on the wrong side of the copyright divide.
Systems Librarian
Posted in Education, Librarianship, Libraries, Library School, technology, tagged education, librarians, librarianship, libraries, library school, technology on September 18, 2011| Leave a Comment »
At the library this week I was very excited to begin cataloging our new video game collection. I love video games and I think they are a great resource to offer our village, since we no longer have any rental stores. I set up the rules sets for the video games this week and created a processing policy for the games. Moving ahead on the movie browser pack reorganization, I created new processing policies for our dvds and a list of steps for reprocessing our current browser packs. I also created a label cheat sheet that lists the new movie genre headings with their respective labels. We cleared up a few last loose ends and I cataloged my first movies under the new schema.
immediately an issue cropped up for us when I was cataloging a DVD that contains a mystery episode from a BBC series. We all wondered should this go under TV or under Suspense/Mystery/… In the end we decided to put it in with the mystery section, but this may change later down the road. This dilemma underscores the challenge we face with this project. As the cataloger, I’ve tried to think of everything. But you can’t think of everything. If one thing in life is certain, it’s that the unexpected will come up. There will be challenges along the way, some moderate and some mild. It will be the first time I have undertaken a project of such enormity and complexity. The details are VERY important in this project, and the details cannot be allowed to slip out from under us. However, I’m excited about the challenge. I think it will be a great thing to accomplish for our community and for ourselves.
In Library School this week This week was very exciting for me. In my intro to the profession class I read about the different career paths that Librarians can choose. Who knew that some Librarians rarely work with the public? In my small library we all work with the public, and I really like working with people. It’s certainly a great break from hours of working in front of the computer when I’m cataloging. But I digress, Wayne State University offers a Graduate Degree Certificate in Information Management (IM) that you can earn along with your MLIS. After reading about career paths, I think this is definitely the right track for me to get on.
I have always loved technology, although if I’m not careful I can end up a little overwhelmed. I remember having a computer with the DOS command line when I was a kid, back when you had to tell the computer what to do! I signed up for my first email account when I was 16, that was only a couple of years after the internet went public with services such as AOL. I was quick to embrace one of the first instant messaging services, ICQ. I even met my husband of nine years (ten in January) on ICQ. He was also an early adopter of technology, and launched his first web business around 2002.
I have built my own computers, own a nook color with a modded SD card that allows it to boot up as an underpowered Android tablet and just generally geek out over the latest and greatest innovations. I joined the library profession as a clerk out of high school. This was an exciting time for libraries and technology. Our library was only partially/incompletely automated and I was eventually asked by the then-director to recommend a new ILS system. I trained staff in emerging technologies and built our first website. I worked at an ebay store briefly before starting my own business ComicChixs. My husband and I have been powersellers on ebay for some years now. We also sell on Amazon.com and I do the majority of my shopping on Amazon. I love shopping online!
Technologies are transforming libraries more rapidly than ever. The cutting edge libraries have mobile apps that run checkout modules! You can scan a book on the shelf for reviews, check it out and access your account all from the app. This is AWESOME! Rather than believing technologies will phase out libraries as some pessimists do, I think libraries will be more relevant than ever. Libraries are teaching centers. If you don’t know how to use the internet, come on in to the library. If you don’t know how to submit your resume online, let us help. There are plenty of people who are rather unskilled in the use of basic technologies such as the internet, word processing, ect. Libraries are here in the same role they have always played: bridging the gap, educating, providing resources.
This is “my thing” and I’m going to pursue it relentlessly. Along with my core eighteen credits of professional Librarianship classes, I plan on taking classes in productivity tools for libraries, database applications for libraries, two systems implementation classes and a couple of coding classes. I believe these skills will make me a great addition to any library, and more importantly, help both directly and indirectly move patrons towards technological literacy.
Ontologies, Taxonomies, Oh My!
Posted in Education, Librarianship, Libraries, Library School, tagged education, librarians, librarianship, libraries, library school on September 10, 2011| Leave a Comment »
In my second week of library school I learned some fun new terms that are used in the LIS field, specifically when discussing organization of information: Ontology and Taxonomy. I still am not quite sure what the difference is between an Ontology and Taxonomy. This week’s readings focused on organizing information and the basics of cataloging. I think Ontology in the LIS field simply refers to the organization schema used in various libraries. Taxonomy is a word associated with more than one discipline, such as the classification of organisms in biology. In the broadest sense a Taxonomy is a parent/child or supertype/subtype relationship with a main trunk and various branches. Taxonomies are hierarchical, but can sometimes be more loosely arranged. I think a perfect example of a Taxonomy is the Dewey Decimal System, which “burrows down” from a broader topic to more and more specific topics as you build the Dewey number and classify an item.
Incidentally, I attended an online workshop for the Dewey Decimal System this week through the library services co-op MCLS. At first I found it very interesting to start learning what Dewey numbers meant. As a mostly copy cataloger, and a cataloger who receives records through Baker and Taylor, I do not build my own Dewey numbers. As an informally trained paraprofessional Librarian, I didn’t even know what most of “The Hundreds” in the Dewey were. The workshop was great as an overview to Dewey, but frankly I am astounded by the antique character of this classification system. I was rather horrified to realize just how arbitrary Dewey really is. Both the classification system as a whole and the number building process is not nearly as tidy as it should be. The fact that only 20% of the section for religion allows for the cataloging of non-Christian materials is offensive to me. Computer books cataloged in next the “mysteries and unexplained” (think UFO’s people) is ridiculous. Why are they next to the unexplained section? Because computers didn’t exist in the late 19th century. Don’t even get me started on the building of Dewey numbers. Even our presenter was at a loss to explain some records he downloaded from Worldcat and commented that “this cataloger was clearly on Crack cocaine,” when looking at a nearly 20 digit long dewey code. At our library we still have the 20th edition of the DDC, and the current edition is the 24th. I am becoming aware that I will need that 24th edition, especially when we start re-classifying our Heritage Room, which is a historical collection currently under a hodgepodge of a classification system. I will have to start to build numbers. I was at a loss today when cataloging a local poet’s self published volume. I finally ended up with 811.08 based on other items in the collection. 811 I understand, American Literature, but where does the .08 come from? I classified two books on birds found in Vicksburg, Michigan under the dewey for a book on Michigan birds in our collection. But this is unsatisfying, because I can’t look at the number and be sure that it is correct.
I feel dewey number building can easily become absurd and the classification system itself harbors natural absurdities. Do patrons use the dewey, do they have any idea what a certain dewey code means? Besides the cookbooks and biographies, I don’t think the majority of patrons use the dewey. In fact, progressive libraries have argued that we should get rid of the dewey all together and go with BISACH, the book store model for shelving. After taking a beginning workshop on dewey, I have such a headache that I have to agree, we use dewey for the library staff. And it really doesn’t even make sense some of the time to us!
On a positive note, the readings for my technology class were great this week. I didn’t learn much that I didn’t already know, but I continue to just really be enamored with the idea of a machine that uses a program and an electric circuit signaling 1’s and 0’s to render a sophisticated video game. It’s such an elegant and simple system. I feel sometimes like computers are something out of the sci-fi and fantasy books I read. I think I need to learn some magic coding!
For my Introduction to the Profession class this week I prepared an overview of the impact E-Readers are having on the Library Profession for the rest of my group. I don’t think anyone else in my group is currently employed in a library, so I think it was good to have an overview from someone in the field. I also reviewed some themes for the blog, but in the end delegated the design to another group member.
In preparation for the major movie reorganization I will be undertaking, I trained two circ staff members in Melcat materials processing. We discussed the movie project at the monthly staff meeting yesterday and finalized the genre categories. I’m still working on a crucial step in the preparation for the movie project and am researching policies for discarding lost/long overdue DVDs. I have contacted a cataloger at the Kalamazoo Public Library about KPL’s policies and hope to hear something soon. I did a new batch upload of patron cards to our Overdrive system.
Something I’m really excited about is the new video game collection we are gearing up for. I created a new holdings code in our system for videogames and created the rule set for this material type. At least for now, 0ur video games:
-Will be on a first serve basis, no holds will be allowed
-Are limit one checkout per patron
-Have no grace period before accruing fines
-Go out for a seven day loan
-Are a dollar a day for each day overdue
-Are not allowed to be checked out by reciprocal card holders or Summer Reading Program cards
Project to Reorganize Movie Browser Packs
Posted in Education, Librarianship, Libraries, tagged education, librarians, librarianship, libraries on September 5, 2011| Leave a Comment »
This week I was asked by our director to come up with a plan for reorganizing our visual browser pack system for our DVDs. Currently they are organized by number based on when the DVD was purchased. So we have over three thousand browser packs organized in a basically arbitrary way (from a user’s point of view) that is cumbersome and inconvenient. This is unfortunate because we are a village library and all our village rental stores have gone out of business. So the movies are huge draw for us, even as inefficiently organized as they currently are. As the cataloger, I was asked to come up with a plan and a potential timeline to organize our DVDs by major genre categories and within the genre categories, by title. Right away the issue of continued “browsability” comes up. This project will take a long time no matter what. Even if every staff member was working towards this reorganization, I don’t believe we could finish in a week or even two weeks. So as the cataloger, it becomes my job to think about what I can do from the back end to make the process easier and less painful for everyone. So, my plan is a back end process involving:
1. Deciding the Genre Categories (We have tentatively decided upon about 11-12 genres)
-only one genre may be assigned to a movie in the catalog call code (for example DVD COMEDY #3201)
-our system only allows about six letters for a call code and a short, easy call code helps the user identify the section to browse under
-subcategories will be established based on visual dividing “cards” between the genres, for example a major genre heading will be ACTION, followed by adventure and westerns
(the visual sub-category system was an idea I formulated with the hope that it will help users identify where to look for related genres without a cumbersome number of genre listings)
2. The cataloger (me, hopefully with some help from my colleague Jessica) reviews each movie record and checks for:
-an authoritative title (in this case, the authoritative title is that title under which most users would look, i.e. Bambi instead of Walt Disney’s Bambi)
-a genre MARC tag (655) consistent with where the movie will be filed, if the MARC tag is not in the record, it must be added
-in addition, the genre catalog call code must be added in the 092 and 996 fields
We have a movie list in Excel format that will be updated concurrently with changes made to the MARC record. The title will be changed to the authoritative version when necessary and the genre will be established. Some of our users use a hard copy of this list to browse for movies (the movie binder), so it must be updated to reflect the new browsing system. It will also help in the re-processing of browser packs in the next steps.
3. The director and I are hoping that our new volunteer will be able to help us with the re-processing of the browser packs. When I finish correcting records for movies 1-50 for example, I will print out the updated list for the processor. The processor will then have access to the authoritative title and genre information. In addition, Jessica or I will prepare a genre cheat sheet for the processor, as each major genre category will be identified by a specific sticker on the browser pack. With these two items, the processor can easily remove the current tab in the top of the browser pack and create a new one based on the authoritative title and genre category, with the appropriate sticker. I will also need to prepare a list of steps to follow for the creation of a new browser pack, and steps to follow for movies and browser packs that can’t be found.
-when a browser pack cannot be found, the movie status must be identified as lost or checked out on the computer
-movies that are currently checked out should have browser packs filed in the back that will be pulled, updated, and returned to the back counter
for filing as a movie that’s checked out
-movies listed as lost or long overdue should be refered to the cataloger for possible removal from the catalog
-if a movie is present on the shelf, but no browser pack is present: check the section of checked out movie browser packs, double check
browser packs waiting to be filed (for movies checked out), check the lost section, check the refilling cart
-if a movie is not present on the shelf or return cart and there is no browser pack, refer to the cataloger for confirmation the movie is still
owned
-if the movie is owned but cannot be found the cataloger will flag the movie as lost: staff action or possibly remove the record if the movie has
not been checked out for some time (an indication the movie is probably lost)
-movies changed to lost: staff action still need a browser pack in anticipation of finding the movie
-discarded movies are identified by number gaps on the movie list
4. Updated browser packs are returned to the shelving cart for filing, or for checked out movies, returned to the back counter for filing. Patrons may still browse as usual according to the number on the browser pack which corresponds to the number on the movie case in the moveable shelving.
5. When all browser packs are updated, a one day shut down on movie checkouts will commence and the browser packs will be refiled according to genre and then title. Visual dividers with genre headings will need to be prepared ahead of time.
Time Frame: as a part time employee with about limited hours dedicated cataloging time each week, it will be difficult to complete the project in less than three to four months. If I checked and updated the records and movie list for fifty movies a day (I don’t even work every day) it would take two months. However, I still must check new registrations, ship Melcat items, generate reports and uploads for Melcat, and catalog new materials. The cataloging of new materials takes precedence over the movie project.
Issues:
1) The library currently has no policy for removing lost items or long overdue items from the catalog, a policy will have to be determined before the project begins.
To-Do:
1) Genre categories must be finalized
2) Policy for removing lost or long overdue items, including a timeframe for removing those items that cannot be found (i.e., those not checked out for one year AND cannot be found will be removed from the catalog)
3) Overview of project for staff meeting on September 9, including information on cataloging donations
4) Create a list of steps for the cataloger to follow
5) Create a list of steps for the processor to follow
6) Create a “genre cheat sheet” for the processor to use
Notes: the re-processor could mark all the movies that are checked out on the printed list and process those browser packs separately to help ensure the browser packs all go back to the right places.